From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 23, 2022
Civil Action 19 Civ. 6754 (KPF) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19 Civ. 6754 (KPF) (SLC)

06-23-2022

MICHAEL TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, RICHARD ALVAREZ, ANTHONY CHOW, FERNANDO BONILLA, and THOMAS FABRIZI, Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH L. CAVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On June 9, 2022, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding their availability to attend a settlement conference during the week of July 18 to July 22, 2022 and, by June 15, 2022, to file a joint letter (the “Letter”) advising the Court of all dates they are mutually available. (ECF No. 96). On June 17, 2022, not having heard from the parties, the Court sua sponte extended this deadline and directed the parties to file the Letter by June 22, 2022 advising whether they wish for the Court to conduct a settlement conference. (ECF No. 97). To date, the parties have not filed the Letter or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, the Court deems abandoned the parties' request for a settlement conference and infers that the parties intend instead to proceed to trial. Pursuant to the Honorable Katherine Polk Failla's April 12, 2022 Order, the parties shall promptly file a joint status letter. (ECF No. 88).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 23, 2022
Civil Action 19 Civ. 6754 (KPF) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Taylor v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, RICHARD ALVAREZ, ANTHONY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 19 Civ. 6754 (KPF) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)