From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 12, 2007
No. 2:03-cv-0477-MCE-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:03-cv-0477-MCE-KJM-P.

April 12, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 23, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 12, 2007
No. 2:03-cv-0477-MCE-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Taylor v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FRANKLIN TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 12, 2007

Citations

No. 2:03-cv-0477-MCE-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2007)