From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 11, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0981 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0981 LKK KJM P.

August 11, 2006


ORDER


For the same reason set forth in the court's order of May 2, 2006, petitioner's June 23, 2006 "motion for discovery" is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is warned, for the second time, that if he fails to follow court orders in the future he may be sanctioned, possibly with dismissal of this action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 11, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0981 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Taylor v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:PETER A. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 11, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0981 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2006)