From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Carbullido

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2021
2:19-cv-2550 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2550 CKD P

11-30-2021

KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. J. CARBULLIDO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 25, 2021, the court ordered defendants Hodgers and Carbullido (defendants) to file their answer within 14 days. Defendants complied by filing their answer on November 8, 2021. On November 18, 2021, the court received a motion submitted by plaintiff asking that the defendants be held in default and sanctioned for not filing a timely answer. As defendants' answer was timely filed on November 8, 2021, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs November 18, 2021 motion is denied. Because it is possible plaintiff never received defendants' answer, defendants shall re-serve the answer within 7 days and file a certificate of service with the court. 1


Summaries of

Taylor v. Carbullido

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 30, 2021
2:19-cv-2550 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Taylor v. Carbullido

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. J. CARBULLIDO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2550 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2021)