From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Byers

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 24, 2023
Civil Action 3:22-cv-689 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:22-cv-689

07-24-2023

COREY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD BYERS, Defendant.


ORDER

CAMPBELL/FRENSLEY, JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a motion requesting teleconference/video conference with the Court filed by the pro se Plaintiff in this matter. Docket No. 41. Specifically, the Plaintiff asks for a “question and answer conference with the Magistrate Judge in this matter.” Id. He requests the conference so that he “can receive the lawful answers he seeks to his questions.” Id.

The Court speaks through its orders. To the extent that the Plaintiff or any other party has concerns or matters they need to bring to the Court's attention, the appropriate vehicle to do so is a motion. Plaintiff in this matter has filed several motions which the Court has addressed and will continue to address in due course. In the event the Court believes that a hearing is necessary on any of the motions, that hearing will be set by the Court.

For these reasons, Plaintiff's motion for conference with the Court (Docket No. 41) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Byers

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 24, 2023
Civil Action 3:22-cv-689 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Taylor v. Byers

Case Details

Full title:COREY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD BYERS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jul 24, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 3:22-cv-689 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 24, 2023)