From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Burns

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Dec 14, 1889
19 A. 241 (R.I. 1889)

Summary

In Taylor v. Burns, 16 R.I. 663, (1889), the action had been dismissed on the motion of the clerk of the court of common pleas for nonpayment by the plaintiff of the clerk's fee for continuance of the case to the next term.

Summary of this case from Sayles v. McLaughlin

Opinion

December 14, 1889.

A case was dismissed on motion of the clerk for nonpayment of the continuance fee. After the term was ended the plaintiff asked for an order reinstating the case. Held, that the plaintiff should file a petition for a trial. A motion to reinstate is improper.

TRESPASS ON THE CASE. On plaintiff's motion to reinstate the case.

This case was dismissed on motion of the clerk for nonpayment of the clerk's fee for continuance. After the expiration of the term at which the dismissal took place, the plaintiff moved for an order to reinstate the case.

Amasa M. Eaton, for plaintiff.


The court is of the opinion that the plaintiff's remedy is by petition for trial, and not by motion to reinstate. The motion to reinstate is therefore denied.

Motion dismissed.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Burns

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Dec 14, 1889
19 A. 241 (R.I. 1889)

In Taylor v. Burns, 16 R.I. 663, (1889), the action had been dismissed on the motion of the clerk of the court of common pleas for nonpayment by the plaintiff of the clerk's fee for continuance of the case to the next term.

Summary of this case from Sayles v. McLaughlin
Case details for

Taylor v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:E.S. TAYLOR et al. vs. JAMES G. BURNS

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Dec 14, 1889

Citations

19 A. 241 (R.I. 1889)
16 R.I. 663

Citing Cases

Sayles v. McLaughlin

In none of the cases so far discussed had the action properly got into the court at all. In Taylor v. Burns,…