From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2021
2:21-cv-0227 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0227 KJN P

11-22-2021

THINTINUS N. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 6, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(1) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's October 6, 2021 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an 1 opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 2


Summaries of

Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 22, 2021
2:21-cv-0227 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:THINTINUS N. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 22, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0227 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2021)