From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Bird

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-2007 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2007 JAM DB P

06-28-2021

ARTHUR TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. LANDON BIRD, Defendant.


ORDER

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 16, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff is granted thirty days to file an amended complaint after this order adopting the recommendation.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Bird

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-2007 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Taylor v. Bird

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. LANDON BIRD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-2007 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)