From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 2, 2023
2:21-cv-00831 DJC EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00831 DJC EFB

05-02-2023

KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Defendants Fears, Adams, and Casillas have moved for a seven-day extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff Taylor's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status (ECF No. 50). Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendants' request (ECF No. 51). Defendants shall have an additional seven days, or until May 8, 2023, to file a reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status (ECF No. 50).


Summaries of

Taylor v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 2, 2023
2:21-cv-00831 DJC EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Taylor v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 2, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00831 DJC EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2023)