From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 28, 2023
2:21-cv-00831 DAD EFB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00831 DAD EFB

02-28-2023

KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Good cause appearing, Defendants' ex parte application for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading is GRANTED. If Defendants' Motion for an Order Revoking Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis Status is denied, Defendants shall file a responsive pleading within thirty days of the Court's final order denying that motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 28, 2023
2:21-cv-00831 DAD EFB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Taylor v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00831 DAD EFB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2023)