From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylo v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 13, 2022
No. SC21-1669 (Fla. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

SC21-1669

01-13-2022

TYRONE TAYLO Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 531988CF004730A1XXXX

To the extent that the petitioner seeks to invoke the Court's all writs jurisdiction, the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the petitioner has failed to cite an independent basis that would allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority and no such basis is apparent on the face of the petition. See Williams v. State, 913 So.2d 541, 543-44 (Fla. 2005); St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla. 1980). To the extent that the petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief, the petition is hereby denied as procedurally barred. A petition for extraordinary relief is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings. See Denson v. State, 775 So.2d 288, 290 (Fla. 2000); Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992). All motions or other pending requests for relief are hereby denied. No motion for rehearing or reconsideration will be entertained.

POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, and COURIEL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylo v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 13, 2022
No. SC21-1669 (Fla. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Taylo v. State

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE TAYLO Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

No. SC21-1669 (Fla. Jan. 13, 2022)