From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taye v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 18, 2020
No. 20-1200 (4th Cir. Sep. 18, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1200

09-18-2020

MENGISTU TAYE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

Mengistu Taye, Petitioner Pro Se. Jessica Eden Burns, John Beadle Holt, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mengistu Taye, Petitioner Pro Se. Jessica Eden Burns, John Beadle Holt, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mengistu Taye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2020). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Taye, (B.I.A. Jan. 31, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Taye v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 18, 2020
No. 20-1200 (4th Cir. Sep. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Taye v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:MENGISTU TAYE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 18, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1200 (4th Cir. Sep. 18, 2020)