From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tawadrous v. Bragg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 17, 2005
No. 05-04-01563-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-04-01563-CV

Opinion Filed March 17, 2005.

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 219-2281-03.

Dismiss.

Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


By a letter dated December 20, 2004, the Court informed appellant that the filed clerk's record did not contain a judgment disposing of all of the parties to the suit. The Court directed appellant to file a letter brief explaining the Court's jurisdiction over this appeal, and warned appellant that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal. By letters dated December 30, 2004 and January 7, 2005, the Court informed appellant that he had not complied with the Court's previous requests for a jurisdictional brief and that the appeal would be dismissed if the brief was not filed. The Court also granted appellant's motion for an extension of time to file an amended brief, ordering the brief to be filed no later than March 1, 2005. Appellant has not filed the brief.

Because the judgment on appeal does not dispose of all of the parties and claims in this suit, on the Court's own motion, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205-06 (Tex. 2001); Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a).


Summaries of

Tawadrous v. Bragg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Mar 17, 2005
No. 05-04-01563-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Tawadrous v. Bragg

Case Details

Full title:SAM TAWADROUS (SALON DE FRANCE), Appellant v. MARK BRAGG AND SCOTT…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Mar 17, 2005

Citations

No. 05-04-01563-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 17, 2005)