From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tavernier v. Toner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: There are triable questions of fact precluding summary judgment for defendants on plaintiff's claim for breach of an alleged agreement for joint ownership in the corporation. Similarly, questions of fact preclude summary judgment for defendants on their defenses based on the Statute of Limitations (see, Tavernier v Toner, 134 A.D.2d 972 [affirming without opinion denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment on timeliness grounds]), laches, abandonment, and lack or failure of consideration. Finally, defendants failed to establish their entitlement to summary judgment either dismissing the action as against the corporation, or dismissing the action against all defendants based on the Statute of Frauds (see, General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [1]; North Shore Bottling Co. v Schmidt Sons, 22 N.Y.2d 171, 175-176).


Summaries of

Tavernier v. Toner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Tavernier v. Toner

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL TAVERNIER, Respondent, v. IRVING J. TONER, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Moss v. McKelvey

We conclude that the court properly granted defendants' motion in appeal No. 1 because the record establishes…

Board, Mgr., Dickerson Pond Condo. v. Jagwani

The appellant-respondent unfinished condominium unit was damaged by water leaking from an allegedly defective…