Taveras v. Semple

4 Citing cases

  1. Sherman v. Doe

    3:22-cv-01159 (VAB) (D. Conn. Nov. 10, 2022)

    Taveras v. Semple, No. 3:15-cv-531 (VAB), 2020 WL 3489529, at *6 (D. Conn. June 27, 2020).

  2. Luck v. McMahon

    No. 3:20-cv-00516 (VAB) (D. Conn. Feb. 5, 2021)   Cited 2 times

    "The proportionality determination limits the scope of discovery by considering the importance of the issues at stake, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the parties' resources, the importance of discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense outweighs the likely benefit of the discovery sought." Taveras v. Semple, No. 3:15-cv-531 (VAB), 2020 WL 3489529, at *7 (D. Conn. June 27, 2020) (internal alterations and quotation marks omitted). The district court has "wide latitude to determine the scope of discovery."

  3. U.S. ex rel. Bonzani v. United Techs. Corp.

    No. 3:16-CV-01730 (AVC) (D. Conn. Dec. 14, 2020)

    "The proportionality determination limits the scope of discovery by considering the importance of the issues at stake, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the importance of discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense outweighs the likely benefit of the discovery sought." Taveras v. Semple, No. 3:15-cv-531 (VAB), 2020 WL 3489529, at *7 (D. Conn. June 27, 2020) (quoting Ceraldi v. Strumpf, No. 3:17-cv-1628 (JCH), 2019 WL 55 58472, at *1 (D. Conn. Oct. 29, 2019) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1) (internal alterations and quotation marks omitted)). The district court has "wide latitude to determine the scope of discovery."

  4. GEOMC Co. v. Calmare Therapeutics, Inc.

    No. 3:14-cv-01222 (VAB) (D. Conn. Oct. 13, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    "The proportionality determination limits the scope of discovery by considering the importance of the issues at stake, the amount in controversy, the parties' relative access to relevant information, the importance of discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense outweighs the likely benefit of the discovery sought." Taveras v. Semple, No. 3:15-cv-531 (VAB), 2020 WL 3489529, at *7 (D. Conn. June 27, 2020) (internal alterations and quotation marks omitted). The district court has "wide latitude to determine the scope of discovery."