From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tavarez-Vargas v. The Bride Box, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 26, 2022
21-CV-9995 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-9995 (JMF)

05-26-2022

CARMEN TAVAREZ-VARGAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. THE BRIDE BOX, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JESSE M. FURMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court having been advised at ECF No. 16 that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby DISMISSED and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, requests to extend the deadline to reopen are unlikely to be granted.

If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tavarez-Vargas v. The Bride Box, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 26, 2022
21-CV-9995 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Tavarez-Vargas v. The Bride Box, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN TAVAREZ-VARGAS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 26, 2022

Citations

21-CV-9995 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2022)