From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tavarez-Vargas v. Steel Tech.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 11, 2022
21-CV-10809 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-10809 (VSB)

03-11-2022

CARMEN TAVAREZ-VARGAS, Plaintiff, v. STEEL TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action on January 21, 2022. (Doc. 1). Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiffs complaint was originally due on January 28, 2022. (Doc. 5.) Since then, Defendant has been granted two extensions of time to respond to the complaint. (Docs. 7 & 9.) The most recent extension Defendant requested and received rendered Defendant's response due on March 10, 2022. (Doc. 9.) However, Defendant has yet to respond to the complaint. Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to seek a default judgment, she is directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than March 24, 2022. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrates that she does not intend to prosecute, I will dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tavarez-Vargas v. Steel Tech.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 11, 2022
21-CV-10809 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Tavarez-Vargas v. Steel Tech.

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN TAVAREZ-VARGAS, Plaintiff, v. STEEL TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

21-CV-10809 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2022)