From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tauszig v. Tauszig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

April, 1929.


Order staying and enjoining defendant from further prosecuting or proceeding to trial of his action for separation reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. Under the circumstances here disclosed the order was not justified. ( Thorne v. Thorne, 203 App. Div. 786, 787; Belasco Co. v. Klaw, 98 id. 74, 75; North Central Realty Co. v. Blackman, 145 id. 199; Grammer v. Greenbaum, 146 id. 3; Indestructible Metal P. Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 id. 199.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tauszig v. Tauszig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Tauszig v. Tauszig

Case Details

Full title:MONA F. TAUSZIG, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS N. TAUSZIG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Roland v. Adirondack National Bank and Trust Co.

This principle has been consistently followed. ( Indestructible Metal P. Co., Inc., v. Summergrade, 197 App.…

MUNICIPAL METALLIC BED MFG. CORP. v. DOBBS

The complaint in this action was dismissed. This stay could be had only by application to the Municipal…