From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taurus, Inc. v. Boeck Fuel Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 31, 1972
38 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

January 31, 1972


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered August 11, 1971, unanimously reversed, in the exercise of discretion and by reason of forum non conveniens, without costs and without disbursements; the motion to vacate the attachment and dismiss the complaint granted; and the complaint dismissed. This cause of action for property damage arose in Wisconsin, wherein both plaintiff-respondent's assignor and defendants-appellants are domiciled. Retention of jurisdiction in New York could be justified only on the basis that plaintiff assignee is a New York corporation. The factor of residence alone, however, no longer controls (see Silver v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 N.Y.2d 356), and no reason appears here why our courts should be burdened with this piece of imported litigation.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Murphy, McNally, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Taurus, Inc. v. Boeck Fuel Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 31, 1972
38 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Taurus, Inc. v. Boeck Fuel Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TAURUS, INC., Respondent, v. BOECK FUEL COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1972

Citations

38 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Prop. Sys. v. Avondale Shipyards

The burden of rejecting jurisdiction is not to be lightly assumed. The application of forum non conveniens is…

Rivera v. Parvez

Medical treatment was rendered in Pennsylvania, where he resided. Clearly, the action has no nexus with this…