In Weiner, a mother alleged that her son, who had no legal interest in her home, committed fraud by misrepresenting the nature of a loan document he presented to her.
Summary of this case from Consolo v. Bank of Am.No. 09-P-883.
April 29, 2010.
Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
In Weiner, a mother alleged that her son, who had no legal interest in her home, committed fraud by misrepresenting the nature of a loan document he presented to her.
Summary of this case from Consolo v. Bank of Am.In Taunton Fed. Credit Union v. Weiner, 76 Mass. App. Ct. 1128, 925 N.E.2d 574 (Mass. App. Ct. 2010), review denied, 458 Mass. 1101 (2010), the court considered an action brought by the credit union to enforce a promissory note and foreclose on its security interest in a mobile home owned by the defendant.
Summary of this case from Brack v. Lincoln Fin. Co. (In re Brack)Full title:TAUNTON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. JANICE WEINER
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Apr 29, 2010
Generally, "a person who is able to read a document but fails to do so when the opportunity is afforded is…
Brack v. Lincoln Fin. Co. (In re Brack)Id. at *5 (citing O'Reilly's Case, 258 Mass. 205, 208-09, 154 N.E. 851 (1927)). In Taunton Fed. Credit Union…