From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tauer v. Heimgardner

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Sep 8, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-3126-SAC (D. Kan. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-3126-SAC.

September 8, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By its Memorandum and Order entered on August 2, 2011 (Doc. 2), the court directed petitioner to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed due to petitioner's failure to commence this action within the one-year limitation period established by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Petitioner was directed to respond on or before September 2, 2011, and was advised the failure to file a timely response might result in the dismissal of this matter without additional prior notice.

Petitioner failed to respond. The court has again considered the record and concludes, for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2011, that this matter must be dismissed.

IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED the petition for habeas corpus is dismissed due to petitioner's failure to commence this matter within the one-year limitation period.

A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tauer v. Heimgardner

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Sep 8, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 11-3126-SAC (D. Kan. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Tauer v. Heimgardner

Case Details

Full title:PREVIN E. TAUER, Petitioner, v. JAMES HEIMGARDNER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 11-3126-SAC (D. Kan. Sep. 8, 2011)