From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatum v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2008
272 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1876.

Submitted: February 26, 2008.

Decided: April 4, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02307-RDB).

Wayne Tatum, Appellant Pro Se.

Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Wayne Tatum appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tatum v. United States, No. 1:06-cv-02307-RDB, 2007 WL 2316275 (D.Md. Aug. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Tatum v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2008
272 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Tatum v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Wayne TATUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Robert M…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 2008

Citations

272 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Stone v. Trump

The Fourth Circuit, relying on 10 U.S.C. § 1169, has held that enlisted service members have no property…