From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatum v. Sunbeam Prods.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2022
C 4:22-cv-02978-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

C 4:22-cv-02978-HSG

08-31-2022

Kelly Tatum Plaintiffs v. Sunbeam Products, Inc., et al. Defendants No C

Seth Workman, Attorney for Plaintiff Joseph R. Coriaty Attorney for Defendant


Seth Workman, Attorney for Plaintiff

Joseph R. Coriaty

Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

[] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

[] Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)

[] Private ADR (specify process and provider) Private mediation - With Byron Rabin or Peter Searle, each with Judicate West

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[] the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)
[] other requested deadline: June 2, 2023

IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:


Summaries of

Tatum v. Sunbeam Prods.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2022
C 4:22-cv-02978-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Tatum v. Sunbeam Prods.

Case Details

Full title:Kelly Tatum Plaintiffs v. Sunbeam Products, Inc., et al. Defendants No C

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

C 4:22-cv-02978-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)