From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatum v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 19, 2008
994 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3D08-822.

November 19, 2008.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Mandamus.

Lorenzo Tatum, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Richard Polin, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ.


We treat Defendant's appeal from an order denying his "Motion for Specific Performance" as a motion to enforce our mandate in Tatum v. State, 957 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). In Tatum, we reversed an order denying Defendant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion and remanded for further proceedings. Id. These proceedings have not yet occurred.

Based on the decision and accompanying mandate in Tatum, the trial court had the option of denying Defendant's motion and attaching portions of the record conclusively showing that Defendant is not entitled to relief, or granting the motion. McIntosh v. State, 914 So.2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Because the trial court has not yet taken either course, we grant the motion and direct the trial court to promptly comply with our previously-issued mandate.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Tatum v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 19, 2008
994 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Tatum v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lorenzo TATUM, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

994 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Castillo v. State

We reverse the order now before us, and remand for an evidentiary hearing. See Tatum, v. State, 994 So.2d…