From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78549

Filed: April 17, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE LARRY L. KENDRICK

Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for appellants.

Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.



ORDER


Judy Tatum (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Tatum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 17, 2001
43 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Tatum v. State

Case Details

Full title:JUDY TATUM, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Apr 17, 2001

Citations

43 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)