From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatum v. Barnes

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2021
19 Civ. 2581 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

19 Civ. 2581 (JPC)

12-14-2021

WAYNE TATUM, Plaintiff, v. NIKKAL BARNES, Defendant.


ORDER

JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge:

On December 13, 2021, Defendant Nikkal Barnes filed a proposed case management plan. See Dkt. 57. Paragraph 1 of the proposed case management plan says that all parties consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Id. at 1. The parties have not, however, filed an executed consent form for a Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings and order entry of a final judgment, in accordance with section 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. An electronic version of a consent form that the parties may use is available on the Court's website at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practicedocuments/kpfSDNYFormConsenting ToProceedForAllPurposesBeforeAMagistrateJudge.pdf. By January 7, 2022, the parties shall file an executed consent form or advise the Court that all parties do not consent to proceeding before a Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings.

Although Plaintiff Wayne Tatum consented to receive electronic service in this action, see Dkt. 20, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a paper copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tatum v. Barnes

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2021
19 Civ. 2581 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Tatum v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE TATUM, Plaintiff, v. NIKKAL BARNES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

19 Civ. 2581 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2021)