From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatum v. Acme Props. LP

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 6, 2013
NO. 03-13-00181-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00181-CV

11-06-2013

Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum, Appellants v. ACME Properties LP, Appellee


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-12-009558, HONORABLE DAVID J. PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants' brief was originally due on July 1, 2013, but was not filed. On July 26, 2013, this Court sent a notice to appellants informing them that their brief was overdue. In response, appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file their brief. We granted the motion, making the brief due August 19, 2013. However, appellants failed to file a brief by that date. On September 25, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by October 7, 2013, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. The October 7 deadline has passed, and appellants have not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(b).

______________________

Scott K. Field, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

Tatum v. Acme Props. LP

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 6, 2013
NO. 03-13-00181-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Tatum v. Acme Props. LP

Case Details

Full title:Raymond Tatum and Sherri Tatum, Appellants v. ACME Properties LP, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

NO. 03-13-00181-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 6, 2013)