From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tatman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Nov 3, 2014
105 A.3d 990 (Del. 2014)

Opinion

No. 469 2014.

2014-11-3

William TATMAN, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.



Decided: Dec. 9, 2014.

Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County, Cr. ID Nos. 1006019613, 1006002784, 0912009017, and 0702023280.

This 9th day of December 2014, it appears to the Court that the State has filed a motion to remand this matter to the Superior Court to vacate its violation of probation (VOP) sentencing orders dated August 14, 2014 and August 22, 2014 and to hold a new sentencing hearing. The State asserts that the Superior Court's VOP sentencing order and corrected order failed to credit appellant with all of the time he has previously served on his sentences. The appellant has not filed any response in opposition to the State's motion to remand.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Superior Court judgments dated August 14, 2014 and August 22, 2014 are hereby VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to hold a new sentencing hearing to consider the State's claim that the appellant is entitled to additional credit for time served and any other claim raised by the parties regarding the appropriate sentence to be imposed. Jurisdiction is not retained.


Summaries of

Tatman v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Nov 3, 2014
105 A.3d 990 (Del. 2014)
Case details for

Tatman v. State

Case Details

Full title:William TATMAN, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Nov 3, 2014

Citations

105 A.3d 990 (Del. 2014)