From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Wenger

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee at Chattanooga
Jun 9, 2006
No. 1:04-CV-379 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. 1:04-CV-379.

June 9, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff Christopher Tate filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) (Court File No. 65). In accordance with Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed a report and recommendation ("RR") recommending the motion for leave to amend be denied (Court File No. 71). Neither party filed objections within the given five days.

Normally parties may object within ten days of the issuance of an RR. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). However, given the short time until trial, the parties agreed if they had objections, they would be filed within five days (Court File No. 71, p. 9).

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rule 72(b), and hereby DENIES Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Court File No. 65).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tate v. Wenger

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee at Chattanooga
Jun 9, 2006
No. 1:04-CV-379 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Tate v. Wenger

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER TATE Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL WENGER, individually and in…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee at Chattanooga

Date published: Jun 9, 2006

Citations

No. 1:04-CV-379 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 9, 2006)