From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Warden, FCI Victorville II

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
2:24-cv-08910-JWH (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-08910-JWH (GJS)

12-20-2024

JEREMY TATE, Petitioner v. WARDEN, FCI VICTORVILLE II, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition [Dkt. 1], all documents filed and lodged in this action including Respondent's motion to dismiss [Dkt. 8, “Motion”] and Petitioner's Response [Dkt. 12], the original Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 10], and the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 14. “Final Report”]. The time to file Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been received by the Court. Having completed its review, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The findings and recommendations set forth in the Final Report are ACCEPTED

2. The Petition is DENIED.

3. The Motion is GRANTED.

4. Judgment shall be entered DISMISSING this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tate v. Warden, FCI Victorville II

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
2:24-cv-08910-JWH (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Tate v. Warden, FCI Victorville II

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY TATE, Petitioner v. WARDEN, FCI VICTORVILLE II, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-08910-JWH (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)