From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 12, 2008
405 Md. 106 (Md. 2008)

Opinion

No. 34, September Term, 2008.

June 12, 2008.

Celia Anderson Davis, Assistant Public Defender (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Carrie J. Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.), Baltimore, for respondent.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, JOHN C. ELDRIDGE, (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.


PER CURIAM ORDER.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 12th day of June, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for further consideration in light of Lawrence Price, Jr. v. State of Maryland, 405 Md. 10, 949 A.2d 619 (2008). Costs in this Court to be paid by Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.

Judge MURPHY did not participate in the consideration of this matter.


Summaries of

Tate v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 12, 2008
405 Md. 106 (Md. 2008)
Case details for

Tate v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darren Joseph TATE v. STATE of Maryland

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jun 12, 2008

Citations

405 Md. 106 (Md. 2008)
950 A.2d 100

Citing Cases

Webster v. State

Within that range a trial judge may freely rule in either direction without fear of being overturned.” Tate…

Walker v. State

Later, in Tate v. State, 176 Md.App. 365, 379, 933 A.2d 447 (2007) ( “Tate I ”), cert. granted,405 Md. 63,…