From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 20, 2006
924 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

Case No. 1D05-5024.

Opinion filed February 20, 2006.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus — Original Jurisdiction.

James L. Tate, Jr., petitioner, pro se.

No appearance for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

ALLEN, PADOVANO and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.

Summaries of

Tate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 20, 2006
924 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Tate v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. TATE, JR., Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA and JAMES V. CROSBY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 20, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)