From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 12, 2019
347 So. 3d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-695

07-12-2019

Cory A. TATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cory A. Tate, appeals his judgment and sentence following an adverse jury verdict, arguing that the 2017 amendment to the "Stand Your Ground" law (codified at section 776.032(4), Florida Statutes ) that shifts the burden of proof from the defendant to the prosecution, should be applied to his case, entitling him to a new pretrial immunity hearing. Based on this court's recent decision in Fuller v. State , 257 So. 3d 521 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018), we agree that Appellant is entitled to a new immunity hearing. We therefore reverse Appellant's convictions and remand for the trial court to conduct a new "Stand Your Ground" immunity hearing where the State will bear the burden of proof. See § 776.032(4), Fla. Stat. (2017). If, after the hearing, the trial court concludes that Appellant is entitled to immunity, it shall enter an order to that effect and dismiss the information with prejudice. If, on the other hand, the trial court determines that Appellant is not entitled to immunity from prosecution, it shall enter an order containing its findings and reinstate Appellant's convictions.

We again certify express and direct conflict with the decision of the third district in Love v. State , 247 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted , No. SC18-747, 2018 WL 3147946 (Fla. June 26, 2018), and the decisions of the fourth district in Langel v. State , 255 So. 3d 359, 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018), and Hight v. State , 253 So. 3d 1137, 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

REVERSED AND REMANDED; CONFLICT RE-CERTIFIED.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tate v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 12, 2019
347 So. 3d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Tate v. State

Case Details

Full title:CORY A. TATE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 12, 2019

Citations

347 So. 3d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)