From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Pollard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jan 20, 2016
Case No. 15-C-1469 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 15-C-1469

01-20-2016

BOBBY L. TATE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM POLLARD, Warden, Waupun Correctional Institution, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

Bobby Tate moves to hold this petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in abeyance so he can present unexhausted claims in Wisconsin State Court. The Court finds that there is good cause for the stay, and the unexhausted claims are potentially meritorious. Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Therefore, Tate's motion to stay [ECF No. 3] is GRANTED, conditioned upon Tate commencing state court exhaustion proceedings within 120 days and returning to this Court within 60 days of completing such exhaustion.

Tate also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but then he paid the filing fee, so this motion [ECF No. 2] is DENIED as moot.

Finally, the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case for administrative purposes. It can be reopened upon motion by the petitioner once the state court process has concluded.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 20th day of January, 2016.

SO ORDERED:

/s/ _________

HON. RUDOLPH T. RANDA

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Tate v. Pollard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jan 20, 2016
Case No. 15-C-1469 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Tate v. Pollard

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY L. TATE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM POLLARD, Warden, Waupun Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Jan 20, 2016

Citations

Case No. 15-C-1469 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 20, 2016)