From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Lindamood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 25, 2016
No. 3:16-CV-93-JRG-CCS (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 25, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3:16-CV-93-JRG-CCS

02-25-2016

RODERICK TATE, # 316412, Petitioner, v. CHERRY LINDAMOOD, Warden, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

State inmate Roderick Tate filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, attacking his 2012 Knox County, Tennessee judgment, convicting him of various drug-related offenses. Pursuant to that judgment, Petitioner is currently serving an effective sentence of twenty-one years' imprisonment. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum & Order upon Respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee.

Since it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that it should be summarily dismissed, Respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. Respondent should specifically address whether the petition was timely filed and whether Petitioner has exhausted his available state court remedies. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(d), 2254(b).

SO ORDERED.

s/ J. RONNIE GREER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tate v. Lindamood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 25, 2016
No. 3:16-CV-93-JRG-CCS (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Tate v. Lindamood

Case Details

Full title:RODERICK TATE, # 316412, Petitioner, v. CHERRY LINDAMOOD, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Feb 25, 2016

Citations

No. 3:16-CV-93-JRG-CCS (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 25, 2016)