From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Lamarque

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2008
No. CIV S-02-2337 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-2337 MCE GGH P.

January 29, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 28, 2007, judgment was entered. This action is now on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

On January 17, 2008, petitioner filed requests for production of transcripts and excerpt of records. Because no transcripts were prepared in this action, petitioner's request is denied as unnecessary. See Fed.R.App.P. 10. The Clerk of the Court will forward all necessary documents to the Ninth Circuit. See Fed.R.App.P. 11.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's January 17, 2008, motions for transcripts and excerpt of records are denied.


Summaries of

Tate v. Lamarque

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2008
No. CIV S-02-2337 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Tate v. Lamarque

Case Details

Full title:DEREK TATE, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY LAMARQUE, et al., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-02-2337 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)