From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Capital Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 13, 2017
Criminal Case No. 17-CV-12221 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 13, 2017)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 17-CV-12221

09-13-2017

LARRY TATE, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL BANK, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Tate's application to proceed in forma pauperis [docket entry 2]. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court may waive a person's filing fees if he shows that he is "unable to pay such fees." Having reviewed the complaint and plaintiff's affidavit, the Court finds plaintiff unable to pay the required filing fee.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Tate's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

s/Bernard A. Friedman

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 13, 2017

Detroit, Michigan

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S Mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic filing on September 13, 2017.

s/Teresa McGovern

Case Manager Generalist


Summaries of

Tate v. Capital Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 13, 2017
Criminal Case No. 17-CV-12221 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Tate v. Capital Bank

Case Details

Full title:LARRY TATE, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 13, 2017

Citations

Criminal Case No. 17-CV-12221 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 13, 2017)