From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 13, 2013
Case No.: 12-cv-01441-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 12-cv-01441-JST

05-13-2013

KAREN TATE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; TIMOTHY REYNOLDS; and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER A. Cabral Bonner Attorney for Plaintiff RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California MIGUEL A. NERI Supervising Deputy Attorney General DAVID PAI Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Timothy Reynolds


CHARLES A. BONNER, ESQ. SB# 85413
A. CABRAL BONNER, ESQ. SB# 247528
LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A. BONNER
475 GATE FIVE RD, SUITE 212
SAUSALITO, CA 94965
TEL: (415) 331-3070
FAX: (415) 331-2738
cbonner799@aol.com
cabral@bonnerlaw.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES, through their respective attorneys of record, A. CABRAL BONNER of THE LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER, attorney for Plaintiff, and David Pai, Deputy Attorney General, attorney for all Defendants, as indicated by their signatures below, to grant Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint to incorporate new allegations which took place after Plaintiff filed her initial complaint.

Good cause exists for the amendment because the new allegations included in the Amended Complaint occurred after the filing of the Complaint, but generally arise out of a common nucleus of operative fact as the original complaint. A copy of Plaintiff s Amended Complaint is attached as Exhibit A. Modified portions are italicized.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

LAW OFFICES OF BONNER & BONNER

________________

A. Cabral Bonner

Attorney for Plaintiff

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

MIGUEL A. NERI

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

________________

DAVID PAI

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants California

Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation and Timothy Reynolds

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT.

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

________________


Summaries of

Tate v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 13, 2013
Case No.: 12-cv-01441-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Tate v. California

Case Details

Full title:KAREN TATE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 12-cv-01441-JST (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)