From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Brazier et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 20, 1920
115 S.C. 283 (S.C. 1920)

Summary

In Tate v. Brazier, 115 S.C. 283, 105 S.E. 413, the Supreme Court of that state said: "The act of the Legislature is plain and specific, and gives the plaintiff a lien, and under the act plea of innocent purchaser cannot avail the appellant."

Summary of this case from Rent-A-Car Co. v. Belford

Opinion

10549

December 20, 1920.

Before DeVORE, J., Greenville, October, 1920. Affirmed.

Action by W.J. Tate against R.R. Wood and Lawrence Brazier for personal injuries from an automobile. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

Messrs. Bonham Price and T.E. LaGrone, for appellants, cite: Automobile Attachment Act: 27 Stat. 737. Similar acts: 4172, 4173, 1 Civ. Code 1912. Brazier was innocent purchaser after the injury to plaintiff, and his rights should be protected: 95 S.C. 29; 13 Wall. 14; 31 N.W. 694 (Wis.); 24 So. 1; 55 S.W. 144; 33 S.E. 995; 82 So. 28.

Mr. B.F. Perry, Jr., for respondent. Oral argument, citing 106 S.C. 463.


December 20, 1920. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


The plaintiff was injured by an automobile owned and operated by Wood. A few days afterwards Wood sold the automobile to Smith. Smith in turn sold it to the appellant for $750 cash.

Plaintiff was injured November 15, 1919. On January 30, 1920, he commenced suit for personal injury against Wood and Brazier, and attached automobile in Braier's hand. Brazier, when he purchased the machine, had no notice of the injury of plaintiff by the machine when owned and operated by Wood. The plaintiff obtained a verdict for $600. There is no question of Wood's liability. He does not appeal. Brazier does, and raised one issue, as to whether or not the automobile was subject to attachment, levy, and sale under plaintiff's lien after the same had passed into the hands of an innocent third party without notice.

The exceptions cannot be sustained. The act of the legislature is plain and specific, and gives the plaintiff a lien, and under the act plea of innocent purchaser cannot avail the appellant. This Court has passed and construed that act in case of Merchants and Planters Bank v. Brigman, 106 S.C. 362, 91 S.E. 332, L.R.A. 1917e, 925.

The exception is overruled, and judgment affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES HYDRICK and FRASER concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MR. JUSTICE GAGE absent on account of sickness.


Summaries of

Tate v. Brazier et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 20, 1920
115 S.C. 283 (S.C. 1920)

In Tate v. Brazier, 115 S.C. 283, 105 S.E. 413, the Supreme Court of that state said: "The act of the Legislature is plain and specific, and gives the plaintiff a lien, and under the act plea of innocent purchaser cannot avail the appellant."

Summary of this case from Rent-A-Car Co. v. Belford
Case details for

Tate v. Brazier et al

Case Details

Full title:TATE v. BRAZIER ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 20, 1920

Citations

115 S.C. 283 (S.C. 1920)
105 S.E. 413

Citing Cases

Rent-A-Car Co. v. Belford

(Post, p. 597.) Citing: 2 Kent's Com., 639; Merchants Planters Bank v. Brigman, 106 S.C. 362; Tate v.…

Stewart v. Martin et al

The lien may be inchoate or contingent until the injured person obtains final judgment but in the meantime he…