From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tate v. Blechinger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2008
Case No. 2:06-cv-02901 JKS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:06-cv-02901 JKS KJM P.

February 21, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended dismissal because Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's direction to file, within 30 days, a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has reviewed the file and notes that Plaintiff has still not complied with the direction to file a complete application. The Court therefore finds dismissal appropriate. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Tate v. Blechinger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2008
Case No. 2:06-cv-02901 JKS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Tate v. Blechinger

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIAL TATE, Plaintiff, v. BLECHINGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:06-cv-02901 JKS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2008)