Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Tate v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

413 F. Supp. 3d 1003 (D. Ariz. 2019)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Tate v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

2 Citing cases

  1. Sims v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

    No. CV-20-01498-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Mar. 17, 2022)

    Tate v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 413 F.Supp.3d 1003, 1009 (D. Ariz. 2019).

  2. Aljanabi v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

    No. CV-20-01777-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 17, 2022)   Cited 1 times
    In Aljanabi, however, the Commissioner at least (1) explicitly argued that the Court need not address the remaining issues and, more importantly, (2) provided some reasoning in the alternative as to why the ALJ's secondary analysis was not erroneous.

    But “it is beyond the scope of the ALJ's authority to insert his or her interpretation of testing results in place of an examining physician.” Tate v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 413 F.Supp.3d 1003, 1009 (D. Ariz. 2019); see also Schmidt v. Sullivan, 914 F.2d 117, 118 (7th Cir. 1990) (“[J]udges, including administrative law judges of the Social Security Administration, must be careful not to succumb to the temptation to play doctor. . . . Common sense can mislead; lay intuitions about medical phenomena are often wrong.”)