extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of judicial resources” (internal quotation omitted)); Tate v. Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CV-19-00276-PHX-ESW, 2019 WL 6050260, at *1 (D. Ariz. Nov. 15, 2019) (“A Rule 59(e) ‘motion is not a substitute for appeal and does not allow the unhappy litigant to reargue the case.'” (citation omitted)).