Tata v. Tata

3 Citing cases

  1. I.T. v. P.G.U. (In re Interest of K.P.L.)

    334 So. 3d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)   Cited 1 times

    As provided in rule 12.540(b), a motion alleging that a judgment is void is not subject to the one-year filing timeframe. SeeSchmidt v. Nipper , 287 So. 3d 1289, 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) ("Under rule[ ] 12.540(b)(4) and [Florida Rule of Civil Procedure] 1.540(b)(4), the trial court may grant relief from a void judgment at any time."); see alsoTata v. Tata , 207 So. 3d 933, 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ("[A] void order is a nullity."). I.T. has asserted that the younger of the two siblings has been and continues to be in her care, that K.P.L. had previously been in her care, that DCF has been involved in the cases, and that DCF had requested that the children stay together and reside with her during the pendency of these proceedings.

  2. I.T. v. P.G.U. (In re K.P.L.)

    No. 2D21-558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2022)

    As provided in rule 12.540(b), a motion alleging that a judgment is void is not subject to the one-year filing timeframe. SeeSchmidt v. Nipper, 287 So.3d 1289, 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) ("Under rule[] 12.540(b)(4) and [Florida Rule of Civil Procedure] 1.540(b)(4), the trial court may grant relief from a void judgment at any time."); see also Tata v. Tata, 207 So.3d 933, 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ("[A] void order is a nullity."). I.T. has asserted that the younger of the two siblings has been and continues to be in her care, that K.P.L. had previously been in her care, that DCF has been involved in the cases, and that DCF had requested that the children stay together and reside with her during the pendency of these proceedings.

  3. Berggren v. N. Miami Bagels, Inc.

    336 So. 3d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

    Although we review a trial court's order granting a motion to vacate for a gross abuse of discretion, any legal issues presented are reviewed de novo. Tata v. Tata, 207 So. 3d 933, 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ; Pares v. Soriano, 306 So. 3d 236, 237 (Fla 3d DCA 2020). Moreover, "this Court applies a de novo standard to the trial court's conclusions of law and application of the law to the facts."