From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tasciyan v. Med. Numerics

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 6, 2013
545 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1550

11-06-2013

TALIN A. TASCIYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEDICAL NUMERICS; TEXTRON SYSTEMS; OVERWATCH GEOSPATIAL SYSTEMS, Defendants - Appellees.

Talin A. Tasciyan, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Christopher Gauvey, TAYLOR & RYAN, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; Donald James Walsh, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Owings Mills, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:11-cv-01467-CBD) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Talin A. Tasciyan, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Christopher Gauvey, TAYLOR & RYAN, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; Donald James Walsh, OFFIT KURMAN, PA, Owings Mills, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Talin A. Tasciyan brought suit against Defendants asserting gender discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Although the district court ultimately dismissed Tasciyan's gender discrimination claim, the case proceeded to trial on Tasciyan's retaliation claim. The jury returned a verdict for the Defendants. On appeal, Tasciyan contends the magistrate judge (1) improperly defined "adverse action" for the jury; (2) improperly instructed the jury regarding damages; and (3) allowed impermissible hearsay evidence. Tasciyan also argues the Defendants' improper reference to gender discrimination during closing argument was prejudicial and misled the jury.

The parties consented to a trial before a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 363 (2006).

Having reviewed the transcript of the jury trial in light of the parties' arguments on appeal, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Tasciyan v. Med. Numerics

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 6, 2013
545 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Tasciyan v. Med. Numerics

Case Details

Full title:TALIN A. TASCIYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MEDICAL NUMERICS; TEXTRON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

545 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2013)