From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarver v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jul 1, 2016
Case No. CIV-14-292-SPS (E.D. Okla. Jul. 1, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-14-292-SPS

07-01-2016

WADE DOUG TARVER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES TO THE PLAINTIFF UNDER THE EAJA

Plaintiff Wade Doug Tarver was the prevailing party in this action under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff originally sought an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $6,327.00, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Docket No. 26. The Commissioner subsequently filed a Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 27], indicating that the parties have stipulated to an attorney's fee in the amount of $5,900.00.

Upon review of the record herein, the Court finds that said amount is reasonable and that the Commissioner should be ordered to pay it to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) ("Except as otherwise specifically provided by statute, a court shall award to a prevailing party other than the United States fees and other expenses, in addition to any costs awarded pursuant to subsection (a), incurred by that party in any civil action (other than cases sounding in tort)[.]"); see also Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1251 (10th Cir. 2007) ("The EAJA therefore permits attorney's fees reimbursement to financially eligible prevailing parties, who make a proper application, and not to their attorneys.").

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion and Brief in Support for an Award of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [Docket No. 26] is DENIED as moot, and the Commissioner's Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act [Docket No. 27] is hereby GRANTED and that the Government is hereby ordered to pay the above-referenced amount to the Plaintiff as the prevailing party herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the Plaintiff's attorney is subsequently awarded any fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), said attorney shall refund the smaller amount of such fees to the Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

DATED this 1st day of July, 2016.

/s/_________

Steven P. Shreder

United States Magistrate Judge

Eastern District of Oklahoma


Summaries of

Tarver v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jul 1, 2016
Case No. CIV-14-292-SPS (E.D. Okla. Jul. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Tarver v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:WADE DOUG TARVER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jul 1, 2016

Citations

Case No. CIV-14-292-SPS (E.D. Okla. Jul. 1, 2016)