From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarver-Bullock v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Oct 3, 2012
NO. 09-12-00367-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 3, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-12-00367-CRNO. 09-12-00368-CR

10-03-2012

CAROL TARVER-BULLOCK, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 11-12619 and 11-13367


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 6, 2012, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent from the notices of appeal, and notified them that the appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals. No response has been filed.

The notices of appeal seek to appeal the trial court's orders continuing appellant's community supervision and imposing additional conditions. The trial court's orders are not appealable. See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (Appellate court lacks jurisdiction on direct appeal from an order modifying the terms and conditions of probation.); see also Christopher v. State, 7 S.W.3d 224, 225 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. ref'd). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

_______________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.


Summaries of

Tarver-Bullock v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Oct 3, 2012
NO. 09-12-00367-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Tarver-Bullock v. State

Case Details

Full title:CAROL TARVER-BULLOCK, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-12-00367-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 3, 2012)