From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tartt v. Wilson Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 16, 2013
No. 3:09-cv-01179 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:09-cv-01179

01-16-2013

KARL TARTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Defendant.


Judge Sharp


ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court hereby issues the following rulings:

(1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 92) is DENIED.
(2) Plaintiffs' Motion to Deny or Defer Summary Judgment (Docket No. 98) is DENIED.
(3) The Court will reserve ruling on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 87). Plaintiffs shall file a response to the pending motion within twenty-one (21) days after entry of this Order. Defendant may file an optional reply within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the response.

It is so ORDERED.

________________________

KEVIN H. SHARP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tartt v. Wilson Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 16, 2013
No. 3:09-cv-01179 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Tartt v. Wilson Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:KARL TARTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

No. 3:09-cv-01179 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2013)