From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tarter v. Raybuck

U.S.
Mar 18, 1985
470 U.S. 1051 (1985)

Summary

holding that the relief "requested by the plaintiff ordering the state to release its interest in real property" is similar to the "retroactive" relief barred by the Eleventh Amendment under Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 662, and not the "prospective" relief permitted by Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332, 99 S.Ct. 1139, 59 L.Ed.2d 358

Summary of this case from John G. Marie Stella Kenedy Mem. v. Mauro

Opinion

No. 84-858.

March 18, 1985.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 742 F. 2d 977.


Summaries of

Tarter v. Raybuck

U.S.
Mar 18, 1985
470 U.S. 1051 (1985)

holding that the relief "requested by the plaintiff ordering the state to release its interest in real property" is similar to the "retroactive" relief barred by the Eleventh Amendment under Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 662, and not the "prospective" relief permitted by Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332, 99 S.Ct. 1139, 59 L.Ed.2d 358

Summary of this case from John G. Marie Stella Kenedy Mem. v. Mauro

applying Texas law

Summary of this case from Dorse v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Case details for

Tarter v. Raybuck

Case Details

Full title:TARTER ET AL. v. RAYBUCK ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 18, 1985

Citations

470 U.S. 1051 (1985)

Citing Cases

Sluder v. United Mine Workers of America

The magistrate examined both parties' arguments. Citing McColgan v. United Mine Workers of America, 124…

Orr v. Shepard

Common law negligence consists of a duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, a breach of that duty, and…