From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tartaglione v. Tiffany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2001
280 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted January 16, 2001.

February 13, 2001.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation and nuisance, the nonparty, Lieberman LeBovit Brofman, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated December 9, 1999, which denied its motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff.

Lieberman LeBovit Brofman, Yorktown Heights, N.Y. (Mitchell P. Lieberman of counsel), appellant pro se.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve its client with a copy of this decision and order by mailing a copy to his last known address by certified mail, return receipt requested, within 30 days of the date of the decision and order, which shall constitute notice to appoint another attorney pursuant to CPLR 321[c]; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appellant shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, within 10 days of the date of service; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the plaintiff until the expiration of 30 days after service upon him, as specified herein, of a copy of this decision and order.

In light of the plaintiff's failure to remain in contact with the appellant law firm or to respond to any of its correspondence, and his failure to pay his retainer fee or a fee for legal services rendered, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to be relieved as counsel for the plaintiff (see, 22 NYCRR 1200.15[c][iv] [vi]; Cashdan v. Cashdan, 243 A.D.2d 598; Matter of Lenk, 218 A.D.2d 802).


Summaries of

Tartaglione v. Tiffany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 2001
280 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Tartaglione v. Tiffany

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS J. TARTAGLIONE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CLAYTON TIFFANY, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 404

Citing Cases

Benefield v. City of New York

As was recently stated in Countryman v Watertown Hous. Auth. ( 13 Misc 3d 632, 633): "Generally, there are…

Tree v. State

A lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if the client "renders the representation unreasonably…