From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tart v. Vigus

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 2, 2020
No. 20-6397 (4th Cir. Sep. 2, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6397

09-02-2020

JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMESE VIGUS; MARK TROCK, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN DOES; TABOR CITY MAILROOM STAFF, Defendants.

Jermaine Antwan Tart, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03207-D) Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Antwan Tart, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Antwan Tart appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Vigus, No. 5:17-ct-03207-D (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2018, & Mar. 2, 2020). We grant Tart's motion to supplement his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Tart v. Vigus

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 2, 2020
No. 20-6397 (4th Cir. Sep. 2, 2020)
Case details for

Tart v. Vigus

Case Details

Full title:JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMESE VIGUS; MARK TROCK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 2, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6397 (4th Cir. Sep. 2, 2020)